Stelth wrote:
Chef:
No, I think you're wrong. I think swarlock was complaining about subscriber costs...not what the broadcaster has to pay. His point is that you have to pay for ad-free music which I mentioned in the 1st post. I just wanted to tip people off to something they might not have known about. In return I got gripes about the cost even though paying is not mandatory and complaints that the station goes off the air in October even though it is now barely July. Interesting response.
Actually it's both. There's a VIP subscription fee to listen to stations without ads but the broadcasters running them still have to pay too.






